Fwd: Re: Project Idea..

[SUNITA]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "SUNITA" <sunitad100 at gmail.com>
Date: 23 Feb 2016 17:23
Subject: Re: Project Idea..
To: "Mulyadi Santosa" <mulyadi.santosa at gmail.com>
Cc:

Dear Mulyadi,

Thank you for your reply.  I m proceeding with the modification in
CFS.  Hope this will be useful research.

Regards,
Sunita

On 2/22/16, Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:24 PM, SUNITA <sunitad100 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Respected Sir/Madam,
>> I am trying to study the effect of Scheduler Policies on Energy
>> Consumption of Portable Device.
>>
>> This will be achieved by modifying the current Completely Fair
>> Scheduler by changing the range of nice values from 40 to 100 and
>> adding a new scheduing policy.
>> CFS uses SCHED_RR, SCHED_FCFS, SCHED_OTHER, SCHED_BATCH Policy for
>> scheduling any process.  The idea is to insert a new scheduling policy
>> by modifying the header files.
>>
>> Can this be a good topic to carry out research.I welcome any other
>> idea related Linux Kernel CFS.
>>
>> Regards,
>> SUNIITA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kernelnewbies mailing list
>> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>>
>
> Hi Suniita
>
> Sounds challenging.
>
> It might be good topic. Just make sure you understand how to measure power
> consumption and prepare various scenario of load simulation to mimic real
> power consumption pattern.
>
>
> --
> regards,
>
> Mulyadi Santosa
> Freelance Linux trainer and consultant
>
> blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
> training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com
>
> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email>
> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20160223/b28e0599/attachment.html