Kernel thread scheduling

[Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu]

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:28:59 -0400, Ruben Safir said:

> >> Others may come to different conclusions. I use www.google.com on a regular basis even though I can't download it.

> That is not even a good analogy.

We're comparing closed Coverty-as-a-service with closed Google-as-a-service.
Seems like a good analogy to me.

I'm failing to see the moral difference between using Google SaaS to look
to see if anybody else has reported a particular kernel error and using Coverty
SaaS to examine kernel code.

As you yourself said:

> If everyone depended on this Software as a Service then you would have a
> nice walled garden to the Kernel Code.

Why do you object to Coverty when Google is almost certainly more depended
on by kernel developers?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20150416/a7454bf1/attachment-0001.bin