Remove Ban?

[Nick Krause]

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:32 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 22:15:13 -0500, nick said:
>> Greetings Fellow Developers,
>> I have finally learned my lesson as you can tell from my newest patches being
>> accepted or considered in good form.
>
> Right now,all I'm seeing in linux-next from you is 2 patches that
> remove FIXME comments.  Given your previous history of submitting
> patches that failed to accurately analyze C program flow, And the
> commit message on one of them:
>
>     Remove FIXME comments about needing fault addresses to be returned.  These
>     are propaagated from walk_addr_generic to gva_to_gpa and from there to
>     ops->read_std and ops->write_std.
>
> doesn't actually address the question of how to deal with fault addresses.
> Yes, they're propagated back - but it doesn't directly address the question
> of how a fault address is handled (in other words, you failed to show that
> write_std actually does the right thing once it gets whatever we send back)
>
> I wouldn't hold my breath....
I submitted the patch. The maintainer changed the commit message not me.
Nick