On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Fixing trivial checkpatch warnings about missing blank lines after declarations.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
... snip ...
From Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
"The "summary phrase" may be prefixed by tags enclosed in square brackets: "Subject: [PATCH tag] <summary phrase>". The tags are not considered part of the summary phrase, but describe how the patch should be treated. Common tags might include a version descriptor if the multiple versions of the patch have been sent out in response to comments (i.e., "v1, v2, v3") ..." this is now ... what? version 6? 7? 8? of a patch that adds three blank lines to a file. so ... still wrong. didn't you say you were going to leave if you couldn't submit the next patch properly? whatever happened to that promise? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ========================================================================