________________________________________ From: Malte Vesper Sent: 02 February 2015 21:43 To: riya khanna Subject: RE: wrapper device driver Why don't you implement your wrapper as a userspace library? ________________________________________ From: kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org [kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org] on behalf of riya khanna [riyakhanna1983@gmail.com] Sent: 02 February 2015 21:24 To: kernelnewbies Subject: wrapper device driver Hi, I'm writing a device driver to to provide a wrapper device around a real device. Is it acceptable to do the following: wrapper_dev_open(flags) { // do additional bookkeeping real_dev_filp = filp_open(real_device_node_path, flags); } wrapper_dev_mmap(mmap_parameters) { // do additional checks return real_dev_filp->f_op->mmap(mmap_parameters); } wrapper_dev_ioctl(ioctl_parameters) { // do additional checks return real_dev_filp->f_op->ioctl(ioctl_parameters); } Is it safe to do something like this? what would be the caveats? Given a good use case, would the maintainers be willing to mainstream something like this? Thanks! -Riya _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies