Jan. 8, 2015
6:37 a.m.
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:46:52PM -0800, John de la Garza wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 04:50:58PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:43:22PM -0500, John de la Garza wrote:
I assume it is a bad idea to depend on true being 1, right? I mean, I should assume that true could be changed to any non 0 value in the future, right?
Why would that matter? Just always test for "true" and "false" and you will be fine.
What if you need to store the value in a bitmap that needs to be 1 or 0 so they can be shifted/anded in?
Then you don't use a boolean if you are worried about it, come on, why is this even a discussion?