Jan. 30, 2015
4:36 p.m.
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:02:01 -0500, David Legault said:
the idea was to load a module passing the path as a module argument so I could access the underlying block device through the link without having to worry about the real block device path.
I hope you realize that scribbling on a block device without making *damned* sure you're talking to the right *real* block device is just asking for data corruption, right? What problem are you *really* trying to solve here? It sounds like your design has some serious layering violations....