On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Rik van Riel wrote:
Nick,
this is a chance for you to prove the nay-sayers wrong (or right).
When re-posting your patch, you can include information on what tips you got on how to improve the patch, and how you applied that information in the new version of the patch.
This is a good idea for anybody resubmitting a changed patch, because it tells other reviewers what changes were made, why, and who pointed out the idea for the change.
my god, rik, you're adorable. :-) i predict that, despite what i've posted *twice*, nick will describe as an "error" what is simply a checkpatch coding style *warning*. let's watch ... rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ========================================================================