On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:21:44PM -0500, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:00:50PM -0500, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote: > I have a driver that manages three sets of identical data structures that > differ only in address values. Currently, I pray that the device file to which > I have callbacks mapped for the driver gets called sequentially, because there > are pairs of mmap's that need to be made. I know that this isn't the most ideal > way to do it, so I'm searching for a better way rather than to swap out the > values on each method call. > > There are several things I am aware of but for each one I have questions: > 1) there are kernel module parameters > If I use kernel module parameters, I need to be able to insert the kernel > module three times in order to have each one have a distinct set of global > memory and mapped callbacks to distinct files. Can that be done? Second, I will > need to compile the driver statically later. How can I pass those parameters > that would otherwise be on the command line in statically?
Never use kernel module parameters for a driver, nor for any other kernel module you create. They are global and don't work for device-specific issues.
> 2) I can compile the driver in three times with a compile time flag. This is > the simplest and easiest, but it requires some buildroot and makefile foo that > I think is a dirty hack.
It's also never accepted, don't do that.
> 3) I could have the init function create three separate files, since it is on > init that I discover what my values are. But then I have to also associate > identical functions that reference global variables in the kernel object. > Duplicating the code would be worse that compiling the same code three times > with a kernel parameter, even though that would help me solve my distinct > globals problem. So how could I parameterisze a char device with data specific > to the instance?
open() gives you the hook to do so, please just do that. There's a whole kernel tree full of examples of how to do this, take a look at existing code please.
After I had the idea in the second email, I think that using the kernel api to distinguish which char device a callback maps to in order to utilize the corresponding data is the best way.
If I could do something along the lines of retrieving the file name, as in a char *,
There is no such "thing" in the kernel (think of symlinks, or different names for the same major:minor pair).
from the file * that is passed in with the callback, or distinguish any one of these:
static dev_t LSKSMM_dev; static struct cdev LSKSMM_cdev; static struct class *LSKSMM_class; static struct device *LSKSMM_device;
Those are all different things, none of them get passed into open(). I don't think you have thought this through very far, where is your source code to take a look at it?
which are also created on module init, it would really make things convenient and easy. I'm currently digging around in the kernel headers, but I think probably somebody somewhere knows what I'm looking for. Some unique field that I can retain on init that I can get back in my mmap/ioctl call to recognize what data to use.
Again, it's all provided directly to you in your open() call, what's wrong with that? thanks, greg k-h