Hi Rajat, On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Rajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net> wrote:
Hi,
I have a single work queue, on which I have scheduled a worker function [using queue_work(wq, fn)] in interrupt context.
I get the interrupt twice before the work queue gets a chance to run, and hence the same function will get queued twice (with different private context - arguments etc) which is fine and expected.
You got it wrong here. bool queue_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq, struct work_struct *work) { bool ret = false; unsigned long flags; local_irq_save(flags); if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))) { __queue_work(cpu, wq, work); ret = true; } local_irq_restore(flags); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(queue_work_on); If you look at function queue_work_on, the function returns immediately if WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT was already set. So in effect your second call to queue_work will just return. HTH Thanks, Arun
Questions:
1) Is it possible that the instance that was queued by 2nd interrupt, can get to run BEFORE the instance that was queued by 1st interrupt? In other words, is reordering possible?
2) Is it possible that one running instance of the function, can get preempted by second instance of the same work queue? I read through http://lwn.net/Articles/511421/ and it talks about same work queue cannot run on different CPU, but I have doubt about single CPU. If If I am writing a worker function, does my code have to be ready that it can be preempted by another instance of the same function?
Please note that I understand that my worker function can preempted by other processes, my doubts are related to the same workqueue.
Thanks,
Rajat
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies