Re: Try/catch for modules?

Martin Galvan <omgalvan.86@gmail.com> writes:

I'm writing a kernel module, and am trying to implement some exception-handling mechanism so that the system won't oops/panic if my module does e.g. a NULL dereference.

Why don't you test your pointer for NULL instead? Sounds like a hell of a lot simpler solution to me. But I'm probably missing something as usual... Bjørn