May 19, 2025
8:34 a.m.
On 18/05/2025 20:22, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
Sun, 18 May 2025 23:15:13 +0530 alexandre.ferrieux@gmail.com :
What is the rationale behind having, for some feature XXX, both configuration macros CONFIG_XXX and CONFIG_HAVE_XXX ?
CONFIG_HAVE_XXX -> XXX is supported. CONFIG_XXX -> Enable XXX.
XXX may not be available on an arch, for eg.
Ah yes, so the *_HAVE_* series are automatically-detected compatibility hints, rather than actual human-selectable configuration decisions. Makes sense, thanks! -Alex