On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:32 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 22:15:13 -0500, nick said:
Greetings Fellow Developers, I have finally learned my lesson as you can tell from my newest patches being accepted or considered in good form.
Right now,all I'm seeing in linux-next from you is 2 patches that remove FIXME comments. Given your previous history of submitting patches that failed to accurately analyze C program flow, And the commit message on one of them:
Remove FIXME comments about needing fault addresses to be returned. These are propaagated from walk_addr_generic to gva_to_gpa and from there to ops->read_std and ops->write_std.
doesn't actually address the question of how to deal with fault addresses. Yes, they're propagated back - but it doesn't directly address the question of how a fault address is handled (in other words, you failed to show that write_std actually does the right thing once it gets whatever we send back)
I wouldn't hold my breath.... I submitted the patch. The maintainer changed the commit message not me. Nick