On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 14:53:30 -0500, "Robert P. J. Day" said:
#define S_IRWXUGO (S_IRWXU|S_IRWXG|S_IRWXO) #define S_IALLUGO (S_ISUID|S_ISGID|S_ISVTX|S_IRWXUGO) #define S_IRUGO (S_IRUSR|S_IRGRP|S_IROTH) #define S_IWUGO (S_IWUSR|S_IWGRP|S_IWOTH) #define S_IXUGO (S_IXUSR|S_IXGRP|S_IXOTH)
Can you give an actual non-contrived example of code where one of these would be preferable to inline coding the mask? And do you plan to include all the various combos? And why should that be done in the uapi headers, rather than glibc/musl/other_c_lib providing it? I'll go out on a limb and say that most programmers would have an easier time mentally parsing the octal constant 0660 than ((S_IRUGO | S_IWUGO) & ~(S_IXUSR | S_IXGRP | S_IRWXO )) (Damn, that's ugly. The sort of thing where I've been hacking C code since 1984, and I'm *still* looking at it and going "Did I get that right, or did I just screw the pooch?"....