April 28, 2011
12:25 p.m.
Hi :) On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 17:16, Sudheer Divakaran <inbox1.sudheer@gmail.com> wrote:
[Question] Note the comma between the variable types and names in the original definition (e.g., "struct timeval __user *, tv" instead of "struct timeval __user *tv").
What is is the reason behind separating variable types and variable names using 'comma' and latter removing the comma character using _SC_DECLx macros?
IMHO, that is done for separating type declaration and the variable name itself. In other word, modularity... -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com