On 14-09-17 07:51 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:08 PM, nick <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
On 14-09-17 07:20 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
<snip>
anyway, it's time for coffee.
rday
Rday and others, That's not what I wanted I was trying to improve my rep after getting banned from vger.org and now it seems I can't even get a patch right. In addition I was trying to do check patch because it was easier for me due to not understanding some parts of the code. Nick
try to understand the code first. if you do not understand the code how do you know that your patch will not break any part of the logic . ok , by adding blank lines you will not break the logic. but yesterday in your other patch you removed an error message . may i ask why did you think that error message is not required ?
thanks sudip
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies I thought that the return statement of NULL to a caller was enough. Nick