Dear all, CONTEXT I am spending the last weeks learning how the kernel executes disk I/O writes and reads from the userland read() to the hard disk drive. I want to see (and understand) the WHOLE PICTURE regarding the VFS, block I/O layer and page cache. To do this, I am following as a base guide Bovet and Cesati UTLK 3rd edition [1] (chapters 12-16 so far) and the new edition of Robert Love's Linux Kernel Development[2] (chapters 13-16). A lot of reading so far that I still need to slowly digest. For the moment, I have not dived yet into the details of "page frame reclaiming", "swap memory" and "filesystem implementations" areas. My knowledge about memory allocation (slab allocator) is also limited. [1] Understanding The Linux Kernel 3rd Edition, O'Reilly [2] Linux Kernel Development 3rd Edition Addison Wesley MY QUESTIONS 1. What do we understand by "buffer pages"? 2. Is the whole page cache content (i.e. the radix tree in the address_space of the different inodes) organized as buffer pages? 3. What is the functional difference between "block device buffer pages" (stored in the address_space of the master bdev inode) and the "file buffer pages" stored in the address_space of a file inode? [ UTLK, page 614 ] Maybe I am missing an important point of course... MY INTERPRETATION (please correct me if I am wrong) Q1 What is a "buffer page"? A "buffer page" is a "struct page" data describing a page allocated to hold one or more i/o blocks from disk. As such, the "private" field points to a single circular list of "buffer_heads" each describing the mapping between the i/o blocks in memory (b_data field) and the i/o blocks on disk (b_size, b_blocknr...). The buffer_head structures themselves are stored outside of the page as shown in UTLK Fig 15.2. --- Q2 Is the whole page cache content organized as buffer pages? YES, there is no other way to link memory-mapped disk i/o data to the struct page pointed by address_space radix-tree entries. --- Q3 block device buffer_pages vs file buffer_pages This I really don't understand. From what UTLK page 614 says: * File buffer_pages ONLY refer to non-contiguous (on disk layout) file contents. * blockdev buffer_pages refer to single-block or continuous (on disk layout) portions of block. My question is: what happens with non-fragmented medium size files that do not contain "disk holes" or non-adjancent block submissions? Thanks in advance for your attention, Miguel