so, i've tested this patch on x86 and AMR (versatilepb). If i would have a big endian architecture i receive reverse order of bytes? Does ntoh() solve the problem? or what would you suggest? 2011/5/23 Denis Kirjanov <kirjanov@gmail.com>
Hm, what about endianness?
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Dmitry Podgorny <pasis.ua@gmail.com> wrote:
--- src/pcnet.c | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pcnet.c b/src/pcnet.c index 5b3d889..39a0d72 100644 --- a/src/pcnet.c +++ b/src/pcnet.c @@ -241,6 +241,10 @@ static int __devinit pcnet_dummy_init_netdev(struct pci_dev *pdev, pp->base = (void *)ioaddr; spin_lock_init(&pp->lock);
+ /* set hardware MAC address to net_device */ + *((unsigned long *)ndev->dev_addr) = ioread32((void *)ioaddr); + *((u16 *)&ndev->dev_addr[4]) = ioread32((void *)(ioaddr + 4)) & 0xffff; + /* init DMA rings */ /* init net_dev_ops */ /* FIXME: -- 1.7.5.rc3
_______________________________________________ Kernel-russian mailing list Kernel-russian@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-russian
-- Regards, Denis