Linux Kernel Tester's Guide is still valid?

[Manuel Quintero Fonseca]

Hello thank you for responding, I am new, and I want to learn, and
looking at the https://kernelnewbies.org page, one of the things we
could do to start is to report bug, which according to a link leads to
that previously shared manual. said guide was not in the league
https://lwn.net/Articles/238838/, but I searched for it by google and
that was the one I found.

as new I thought the best way would be to look for the errors of my
kernel and report them, then look for the solutions.

Now if someone has a better guide to do the search for kernel errors
and report them, I would be very grateful
El vie., 19 oct. 2018 a las 1:39, <valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu> escribió:
>
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 19:05:35 -0600, Manuel Quintero Fonseca said:
> > Hi, Linux Kernel Tester's Guide is still valid?
> >
> > http://www.unixy.pl/maciek/doc/lktg/handbook-en.pdf
>
> Depends.  Are you insisting on "type this command" validity, or general concepts?
>
> Much of section 1 (from 1.2 to 1.5) has been rendered totally obsolete by the linux-next
> development tree.
>
> Most of the basic concepts remain the same - a binary search using git hasn't changed
> much, and their explanation of things that can go wrong still applies to most uses
> of 'git bisect'.   However, they refer to 'git-this', 'git-that', 'git-whatever', while most
> more recent documentation uses 'git this', 'git that' etc.
>
> And of course, the details of what testing *you* should be doing will depend on
> *why* you're doing testing in the first place - see the recent discussion about
> performance testing for examples.