Linux Kernel Tester's Guide is still valid?

[valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu]

On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 19:05:35 -0600, Manuel Quintero Fonseca said:
> Hi, Linux Kernel Tester's Guide is still valid?
>
> http://www.unixy.pl/maciek/doc/lktg/handbook-en.pdf

Depends.  Are you insisting on "type this command" validity, or general concepts?

Much of section 1 (from 1.2 to 1.5) has been rendered totally obsolete by the linux-next
development tree.

Most of the basic concepts remain the same - a binary search using git hasn't changed
much, and their explanation of things that can go wrong still applies to most uses
of 'git bisect'.   However, they refer to 'git-this', 'git-that', 'git-whatever', while most
more recent documentation uses 'git this', 'git that' etc.

And of course, the details of what testing *you* should be doing will depend on
*why* you're doing testing in the first place - see the recent discussion about
performance testing for examples.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20181019/d5963ea9/attachment.sig>