workqueues - how to use them correctly
getarunks at gmail.com
Wed Feb 11 06:28:27 EST 2015
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Roshan A <roshan.len at gmail.com> wrote:
> hi all,
> My question is regarding the correct use of workqueues. I have a
> driver which queues a work item in the interrupt handler. The bottom
> half function ( the workitem -function ) does have proper locking (
> mutex ) in place for atomicity.
> With this setup, since the interrupts are enabled, it's possible to
> have a scenario where, when one workitem is being executed, another
> can be queued up, which results in the workitems being executed in
> parallel, however since there is a mutex, one thread will sleep.
> is this particular scenario considered bad or discouraged ?
This should not happen if you are using the same work item.
All workqueues are now non-reentrant - any work item is guaranteed to
be executed by at most one worker system-wide at any given time.
> Thank you,
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
More information about the Kernelnewbies