Kernel 188.8.131.52 64bit Crash/Hung
moon.linux at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 27 02:00:28 EST 2015
Show it has only 8 core of CPU. Why are you setting the CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64.
certainly it will have a issue in the kernel.
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:27 AM, Giridhara RP (grp) <grp at cisco.com> wrote:
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:15 AM
To: Giridhara RP (grp)
Cc: Greg KH; kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Re: Kernel 184.108.40.206 64bit Crash/Hung
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:06:00 +0000, "Giridhara RP (grp)" said:
> Which kernel version should I use to solve this crash/panic?
That will depend on exactly why you're still running a 2.6.32 kernel from 6 years ago. Remember - the fact it's all the way up to 220.127.116.11 doesn't mean you have all the bugfixes. It only means you have all the bugfixes that qualified for the -stable side of the fence (which is a small fraction of all the fixes that have happened in the past 6 years).
We were running 18.104.22.168 assuming it's a stable build and my assumption was wrong :(. Should I go ahead with stable 3.18.3 [2015-01-16 ].
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
More information about the Kernelnewbies