Usage of unlikely in RCU code
Julie Sullivan
kernelmail.jms at gmail.com
Mon Aug 1 17:28:11 EDT 2011
Hi list,
I'm looking at RCU at the moment and (on reading a recent article by
Paul McKenney on LWN) I've spotted something I'm a bit confused by in
this code, a function which is defined in kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:
void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
{
struct task_struct *t = current;
barrier(); /* needed if we ever invoke rcu_read_unlock in rcutree.c */
--t->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
barrier(); /* decrement before load of ->rcu_read_unlock_special */
if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0 &&
unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special)))
rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
WARN_ON_ONCE(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting) < 0);
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
}
Specifically, the conditional
if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0 &&
unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special)))
rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
I've googled for 'likely/unlikely' and i've seen
if (unlikely(...
before in kernel code, and I might understand if the logical operator
here were || not &&, but why is the 'unlikely' attribute only applied
to the second operand here? Because both must be evaluated, with
left-to-right associativity, and then both must be true for the branch
to be taken, right? If it's necessary for branch
prediction/optimization purposes shouldn't it be applied to both or
the first one? Or might the operands also be re-ordered by the
compiler or processor so that the second is evaluated before the
first?
What am I misunderstanding about this attribute?
Cheers
Julie
More information about the Kernelnewbies
mailing list