Hello, I'm glad to see that spamikaze development has been renewed. I have not used it yet, but it looks to be something very applicable to my needs...but of course with modifications for my site. My questions mostly address differences in the way that I maintain my own RBL zones and RWL zone and ways to integrate spamikaze into my local config. 1. spamikaze can use a whitelist file. Would it be possible to also make it query one or more RWL zones? Since Net::DNS is already a requirement, no new modules should be needed. 2. I already have my own RBL (custom written perl to add and manage it). I haven't looked yet to see the differences between your schema and mine. In your opinion, is the ability to twist spamikaze into inserting into different types of schema useful? Or is better to just have spamikaze insert the data where it wants and instead use some sort of migrate script to cherrypick the bits of data into my RBL schema? Hmm, I guess I didn't really have much in the way of questions. Thanks :-) ...Todd -- If Americans could eliminate sugary beverages, potatoes, white bread, pasta, white rice and sugary snacks, we would wipe out almost all the problems we have with weight and diabetes and other metabolic diseases. -- Dr. Walter Willett, Harvard School of Public Health
On 07/11/2011 10:26 AM, Todd Lyons wrote:
1. spamikaze can use a whitelist file. Would it be possible to also make it query one or more RWL zones? Since Net::DNS is already a requirement, no new modules should be needed.
It does this already.
2. I already have my own RBL (custom written perl to add and manage it). I haven't looked yet to see the differences between your schema and mine. In your opinion, is the ability to twist spamikaze into inserting into different types of schema useful? Or is better to just have spamikaze insert the data where it wants and instead use some sort of migrate script to cherrypick the bits of data into my RBL schema?
If your scheme is fast enough, it will be pretty easy to write a new Spamikaze database module to use that, instead of the schemes that come with Spamikaze. I'd like to think the database is abstracted away fairly well in Spamikaze. -- All rights reversed.
participants (2)
-
Rik van Riel -
Todd Lyons