Re: Question about shared interrupts in devicetree
Hi Geert,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> hat am 9. April 2015 um 09:37 geschrieben:
[...]
Could you please explain the benefit / reason of this approach?
Since you have different logical modules in the subsystem, this allows to model the subsystem as separate modules and a separate interrupt controller, and have separate drivers for all modules.
Look at da9063 for an example (there are more according to "git grep irq_chip -- drivers/mfd", but not all of them may have DT bindings).
thanks for the hint, but this makes my patch series not really smaller. I invested a lot of time (started in September 2014) and i want to submit at least 1 of the 3 drivers soon as possible. I think the best approch would be to submit my series with option B as a proposal. In the discussion about the patch it would be easier to decide if a interrupt controller is really necessary.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Stefan
participants (1)
-
Stefan Wahren