Difference b/w CKRM and other linux schedulers
Hi, In an attempt to understand CKRM, I need to find where it stands as compared to O(1) and CFS? What is difference between O(1), CFS and CKRM? What features differentiate them? Appreciate your inputs with regards to this. Thanks, Sowmya =====-----=====-----===== Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you
Hi,
In an attempt to understand CKRM, I need to find where it stands as compared to O(1) and CFS? What is difference between O(1), CFS and CKRM? What features differentiate them?
Appreciate your inputs with regards to this.
Hi Sowmya
From what I understand CKRM was not a dedicated task scheduler as in the case of the old O(1) or the CFS but a project working towards the grouping and identifying of tasks as classes so that they could be managed/tracked according to a particular resource 'identity' at a higher systems management level. I don't think the CKRM project is active any more, but I could be wrong...
In the current kernel this functionality is now I believe provided for by cgroups. Read the files in Documentation/cgroups/ for more info on managing process aggregates this way. Cheers Julie
In an attempt to understand CKRM, I need to find where it stands as compared to O(1) and CFS? What is difference between O(1), CFS and CKRM? What features differentiate them?
Appreciate your inputs with regards to this.
Hi Sowmya
From what I understand CKRM was not a dedicated task scheduler as in the case of the old O(1) or the CFS but a project working towards the grouping and identifying of tasks as classes so that they could be managed/tracked according to a particular resource 'identity' at a higher systems management level. I don't think the CKRM project is active any more, but I could be wrong...
In the current kernel this functionality is now I believe provided for by cgroups. Read the files in Documentation/cgroups/ for more info on managing process aggregates this way.
Cheers Julie
Thanks Julie! =====-----=====-----===== Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you
participants (2)
-
julie Sullivan -
Sowmya Sridharan