Quoting Ezequiel García <elezegarcia@gmail.com>:

Hello,

I would like to know what is the current status of the tiny linux project? (The current goals, status and activeness). I've found this:

http://elinux.org/Linux_Tiny

but it seems a bit outdated.

Also, I would like to know what's the smaller kernel (static and dynamic memory footprint) that can be achieved right now (without losing signicant funcionality).

Is it possible to run linux a 1 MB SRAM board (no DRAM) ? (I am thinking at a ARM7 LPC2294 header board).

Thanks a lot, Ezequiel.

you might find what you're looking for at distrowatch.org d

_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

-- It is told that such are the aerodynamics and wing loading of the bumblebee that, in principle, it cannot fly...if all this be true...life among bumblebees must bear a remarkable resemblance to life in the United States. -- John Kenneth Galbraith, in American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power

minimum specs is available within the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiny_Core_Linux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damn_Small_Linux 2012/4/10 Ezequiel García <elezegarcia@gmail.com>

Hello,

I would like to know what is the current status of the tiny linux project? (The current goals, status and activeness). I've found this:

http://elinux.org/Linux_Tiny

but it seems a bit outdated.

Also, I would like to know what's the smaller kernel (static and dynamic memory footprint) that can be achieved right now (without losing signicant funcionality).

Is it possible to run linux a 1 MB SRAM board (no DRAM) ? (I am thinking at a ARM7 LPC2294 header board).

Thanks a lot, Ezequiel.

_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

-- Regards, Peter Teoh