Re: Year 2038 time set problem
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 14:15:53 +0100, Piotr Figiel said:
According to kernel.org website 4.1 has projected EOL in May 2018. Is the information about kernel releases on kernel.org irrelevant/ shouldn't be trusted? Or my understanding of longterm kernel trees is incorrect?
Do you *really* want to be doing any new development on something that goes off support in 3 months? Why are you even looking at 4.1? That was all the way back in June 2015, and since then, there have been 220,344 commits totalling: [/usr/src/linux] git diff --shortstat v4.1 v4.16-rc3 55263 files changed, 8740289 insertions(+), 2695706 deletions(-) (Heck, even my Raspberry Pi and my Linksys router are running 4.14 based kernels :) And feel free to 'name and shame' if a vendor is doing something that traps you at that release - that's a vendor behavior that should be discouraged.
Hi, 2018-02-26 16:21 GMT+01:00 <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 14:15:53 +0100, Piotr Figiel said:
According to kernel.org website 4.1 has projected EOL in May 2018. Is the information about kernel releases on kernel.org irrelevant/ shouldn't be trusted? Or my understanding of longterm kernel trees is incorrect?
Do you *really* want to be doing any new development on something that goes off support in 3 months?
Why are you even looking at 4.1?
I guess because original post author asked about 4.1. I'm more concerned about general rule, not this specific kernel branch.
(Heck, even my Raspberry Pi and my Linksys router are running 4.14 based kernels :)
That's nice. Best regards, Piotr.
participants (2)
-
Piotr Figiel -
valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu