On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, anish kumar 
.
Timer interrupts is supposed to cause scheduling and scheduler may or
may not pick up your last process(we always use the term "task" in
kernel space) after handling timer interrupt.
>

Sorry if I may disagree, correct me if wrong.   Timer interrupt and scheduler is two different thing.   I just counted in the "drivers" subdirectory, there are at least more than 200 places where "setup_timer()" is called, and these have nothing to do with scheduling.   For eg, heartbeat operation etc.  Not sure I misunderstood something?

--
Regards,
Peter Teoh