On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:49:50 +0200, Bjørn Mork said:

> 1) There should be *some* body text describing the patch, even for a very
>    basic change which is explained in full in subject.  This goes first
>    in the body, separated from the tags with a single empty line.

And to add to what he said:

Explaining the *why* is better than the *how*.

"Add Documentation/initest.txt" isn't that helpful - we can see from the diff
that's what it does.  "Add documentation explaining how to deal with the
Frobnizz  3000's wonky interrupts" is a lot better.

Similarly, "fix off-by-one error" is OK - but extending it to "fix off-by-one
error that causes the wireless card to select the wrong channel" is a lot better.

Sell us that patch - tell us *why* we want it in the kernel, and why we should
spend time reviewing it....

Please, you should not bother to review this patch seriously. As I have written in