<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Perry Hooker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:perry.hooker@gmail.com" target="_blank">perry.hooker@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi everyone,<br>
<br>
I recently submitted a patch to the kernel mailing list:<br>
<a href="https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/21/712" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/<wbr>21/712</a></blockquote><div><br></div><div><a href="http://lkml.org">lkml.org</a> seems to be down! Wow, what did you do!?! :P</div><div><br></div><div>-mandeep</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
I received some feedback on the patch. After a bit of polite<br>
back-and-forth, the respondent stopped replying when I asked for more<br>
information, and I haven't heard anything from the maintainers.<br>
<br>
Based on my analysis (contained in the thread), I still think the<br>
patch is correct & appropriate.<br>
<br>
What's the best way to determine if this is a good fix or not?<br>
How should I proceed if the patch is, in fact, a good fix?<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
Perry<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Kernelnewbies mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org">Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.<wbr>org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.kernelnewbies.<wbr>org/mailman/listinfo/<wbr>kernelnewbies</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>