<div dir="ltr">Why? That's what the vast majority of the kernel is written in (besides assembler, but what I'm looking for isn't a way to write safe assembler). Plus, tons of people in the kernel development community *must* have some concern or interest in security. I don't care if the kernel is written in C, but I sure would like my kernel module to be safer. If I can get it I don't care what language it's in-it just has to work and *be secure*.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Robert P. J. Day <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rpjday@crashcourse.ca" target="_blank">rpjday@crashcourse.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote:<br>
<br>
> Ok- so I know that C is the defacto standard for kernel<br>
</span>> development...<br>
<br>
and that's probably where you should have stopped typing. :-)<br>
<br>
rday<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
<br>
========================================================================<br>
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA<br>
<a href="http://crashcourse.ca" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://crashcourse.ca</a><br>
<br>
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/rpjday" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/rpjday</a><br>
LinkedIn: <a href="http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday</a><br>
========================================================================<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>