<div dir="ltr">Hi Rik,<div><br></div><div>Thanks very much for your comments!</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Best Regards<div>Nan Xiao</div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Rik van Riel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:riel@surriel.com" target="_blank">riel@surriel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 07/19/2015 11:43 PM, Nan Xiao wrote:<br>
> Hi all,<br>
><br>
> Per my understanding, the "processor" in "SMP" and "UP" should be a<br>
> "logic CPU", not a "physical CPU".<br>
> If the "physical CPU" contains 2 "cores", and every "core" contains 2<br>
> "hardware threads", then the "processor"<br>
> should stands for "hardware thread".<br>
><br>
> Is my understanding right? Thanks very much in advance!<br>
<br>
</span>Yes, you are absolutely right, when speaking from a<br>
software point of view.<br>
<br>
Each logical processor shows up as a CPU in Linux.<br>
<br>
Of course, if you were to talk to somebody installing<br>
physical CPUs in systems, you would get a different<br>
answer :)<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
All rights reversed.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Kernelnewbies mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org">Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>