<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Bin Wang <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wbin00@gmail.com" target="_blank">wbin00@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I build the kernel with "make rpm-pkg" and "make binrpm-pkg". The "make<br>
help" shows:<br>
<br>
rpm-pkg - Build both source and binary RPM kernel packages<br>
binrpm-pkg - Build only the binary kernel package<br>
<br>
But except the different process, the RPMs I got seems same. I look the<br>
kernel.spec and binkernel.spec, it seems same, too. I'm wonder does<br>
rpm-pkg really build source?<br>
<br></blockquote><div>I think this very distribution specific question. RPMs are mostly used by Redhat based distros, Suse distro and probably few others. <br>I would suggest asking this question of distro mailing list. <br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Thanks,<br>
Bin Wang<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Kernelnewbies mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org">Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies" target="_blank">http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Thank you <br>Warm Regards<br>Anuz<br>