<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/8/14 Ezequiel Garcia <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:elezegarcia@gmail.com" target="_blank">elezegarcia@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hey wanny,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Mulyadi Santosa<br>
<<a href="mailto:mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com">mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi.. :)<br>
><br>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:14 AM, ÍõÕÜ <<a href="mailto:wangzhe5004@gmail.com">wangzhe5004@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> i use the __init for function print_k.<br>
>> in my opinion after the fisrt invoking the print_k in the hello_init.<br>
>> the memory of print_k will be freed,and the second invoking will<br>
>> not be executed.but the result of second invoking is executing .<br>
>><br>
>> why?<br>
><br>
> because you're still in module_init.... :)<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</div>Yes, and the function is still in the stack!<br>
<br>
On the other hand.. think what would happen if things would work<br>
like you say.<br>
<br>
We would have a *very* strange behavior,<br>
and pretty counter-intuitive, don't you think so?<br>
</blockquote></div><br><div> Thank you very much for reply.</div><div> as you say,and function is still in the stack,don't be freed</div><div> in the memory,what is __init had done? who can give a sample example</div>
<div> to explain the difference existing __init or not? </div>