thanks for your sir,<br>but one more thing i like to know is that if all the modules needed by the kernel are in `initramfs` image then what is the need of the /lib/modules/<kernel version>?? won`t it be redundant??<br>
<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Mulyadi Santosa <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com" target="_blank">mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:33 PM, beyond.hack <<a href="mailto:beyond.hack@gmail.com">beyond.hack@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> hello experts,,<br>
> I am on Fedora 16 and My current kernel is as per the uname -r output<br>
> is 3.1.0-7.fc16.i686.PAE<br>
><br>
> I am compiling a kernel 3.4.1 and after the compilation the bzimage and<br>
> initramfs are successfully generated..<br>
> then doing a<br>
> #make install<br>
> is giving error like this::<br>
><br>
> sh-4.2# make install<br>
> sh /usr/local/src/linux-3.4.1/arch/x86/boot/install.sh 3.4.1<br>
> arch/x86/boot/bzImage \<br>
> System.map "/boot"<br>
> WARNING: Couldn't open directory /lib/modules/3.4.1: No such file or<br>
> directory<br>
<br>
</div>maybe you forgot to do "make modules" followed by "make<br>
modules_install" after generating kernel image?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
regards,<br>
<br>
Mulyadi Santosa<br>
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant<br>
<br>
blog: <a href="http://the-hydra.blogspot.com" target="_blank">the-hydra.blogspot.com</a><br>
training: <a href="http://mulyaditraining.blogspot.com" target="_blank">mulyaditraining.blogspot.com</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br>