<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
> Just curious, are you enabling IP forwarding in A? Or bridging or something?<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I am not enabling IP forwarding in A. no bridging .</div><div><br></div><div>I haven't set som special network configuration.</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div>> From: mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com<br>> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:18:17 +0700<br>> Subject: Re: two netcard configed in one subnet problem<br>> To: duanshuidao@hotmail.com<br>> CC: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org<br>> <br>> Hi....<br>> <br>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:16, hu jun <duanshuidao@hotmail.com> wrote:<br>> > then I unplug eth1 , ethtool eth1 show "Link detected: no",<br>> ><br>> > now on B :ping 192.168.160.11 and 192.168.160.21, both are ok, too.<br>> <br>> Maybe the thing that happen is that when you ping eth1 of A from B,<br>> the flow is: B send ICMP--> A' eth0 receives it--> forward it to eth1<br>> <br>> Eth1, in my humble opinion, is not really answering "by hardware", but<br>> just it's network stack. Since you made eth0 and eth1 under the same<br>> broadcast address, the effect is like you were doing bonding between<br>> eth0+eth1 in A.<br>> <br>> Just curious, are you enabling IP forwarding in A? Or bridging or something?<br>> <br>> <br>> -- <br>> regards,<br>> <br>> Mulyadi Santosa<br>> Freelance Linux trainer and consultant<br>> <br>> blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com<br>> training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Kernelnewbies mailing list<br>> Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org<br>> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies<br></div></div> </div></body>
</html>