<br><tt><font size=2><br>
> > In an attempt to understand CKRM, I need to find where it stands
as compared<br>
> > to O(1) and CFS?<br>
> > What is difference between O(1), CFS and CKRM? What features
differentiate<br>
> > them?<br>
> ><br>
> > Appreciate your inputs with regards to this.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Hi Sowmya<br>
> >From what I understand CKRM was not a dedicated task scheduler
as in<br>
> the case of the old O(1) or the CFS but a project working towards
the<br>
> grouping and identifying of tasks as classes so that they could be<br>
> managed/tracked according to a particular resource 'identity' at a<br>
> higher systems management level. I don't think the CKRM project is<br>
> active any more, but I could be wrong...<br>
> <br>
> In the current kernel this functionality is now I believe provided
for<br>
> by cgroups. Read the files in Documentation/cgroups/ for more info
on<br>
> managing process aggregates this way.<br>
> <br>
> Cheers<br>
> Julie<br>
> <br>
Thanks Julie!</font></tt><pre style="white-space:normal">=====-----=====-----=====<br>Notice: The information contained in this e-mail<br>message and/or attachments to it may contain <br>confidential or privileged information. If you are <br>not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, <br>review, distribution, printing or copying of the <br>information contained in this e-mail message <br>and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If <br>you have received this communication in error, <br>please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and <br>immediately and permanently delete the message <br>and any attachments. Thank you<br><br><br></pre>