request for feedback before sending this patch

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 10:51:00PM -0700, ozzloy wrote:
> i'd like to get some feedback before sending this off to the regular
> mailing list.
> i'm following Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and i think this
> is OK, but i thought that before and was wrong.
> 
> i'm not even sure if i should be asking here first, or sending this to the
> list.
> 
> are there any problems with the cleanup patch below?
> it fixes something that checkpatch.pl lists as an error for pointer
> location.
> 
> =========================================================================
> >From 3ce7c7a3333aecaad6c28e0e1c17ce5b554274b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Daniel Watson <ozzloy at challenge-bot.com>
> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 11:31:31 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: fix declaration to match 'foo *bar'
> 
> put '*' next to variable to match kernel style from checkpatch
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Watson <ozzloy at challenge-bot.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_io.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_io.h
> b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_io.h
> index 6910e2b430e24..0e390eda5b4d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_io.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_io.h
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ void free_io_queue(struct adapter *adapter);
>  void async_bus_io(struct io_queue *pio_q);
>  void bus_sync_io(struct io_queue *pio_q);
>  u32 _ioreq2rwmem(struct io_queue *pio_q);
> -void dev_power_down(struct adapter * Adapter, u8 bpwrup);
> +void dev_power_down(struct adapter *Adapter, u8 bpwrup);
> 
>  #define PlatformEFIOWrite1Byte(_a,_b,_c) \
>   rtw_write8(_a,_b,_c)
> -- 
> 2.34.1

Looks correct to me, send away!

> =========================================================================
> 
> 
> 
> here's who i plan to send to:
> Larry Finger <Larry.Finger at lwfinger.net>
> Phillip Potter <phil at philpotter.co.uk>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> linux-staging at lists.linux.dev

Yes.

> 
> should i include this list?
> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org

If you really want to, sure.  It's not required.

> it is called a list of last resort here
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html
> but it is in the output of get-maintainer.pl for this patch.

It's in the output of all runs of that tool, as you say, it's the last
resort.

good luck!

greg k-h