Creating compressed backing_store as swapfile
Austin S. Hemmelgarn
ahferroin7 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 5 11:07:12 EST 2018
On 11/5/2018 10:58 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:31:46PM +0530, Pintu Agarwal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have one requirement:
>> I wanted to have a swapfile (64MB to 256MB) on my system.
>> But I wanted the data to be compressed and stored on the disk in my swapfile.
>> [Similar to zram, but compressed data should be moved to disk, instead of RAM].
>>
>> Note: I wanted to optimize RAM space, so performance is not important
>> right now for our requirement.
>>
>> So, what are the options available, to perform this in 4.x kernel version.
>> My Kernel: 4.9.x
>> Board: any - (arm64 mostly).
>>
>> As I know, following are the choices:
>> 1) ZRAM: But it compresses and store data in RAM itself
>> 2) frontswap + zswap : Didn't explore much on this, not sure if this
>> is helpful for our case.
>> 3) Manually creating swapfile: but how to compress it ?
>> 4) Any other options ?
>
> Loop device on any filesystem that can compress (such as btrfs)? The
> performance would suck, though -- besides the indirection of loop, btrfs
> compresses in blocks of 128KB while swap wants 4KB writes. Other similar
> option is qemu-nbd -- it can use compressed disk images and expose them to a
> (local) nbd client.
Swap on any type of a networked storage device (NBD, iSCSI, ATAoE, etc)
served from the local system is _really_ risky. The moment the local
server process for the storage device gets forced out to swap, you deadlock.
Performance isn't _too_ bad for the BTRFS case though (I've actually
tested this before), just make sure you disable direct I/O mode on the
loop device, otherwise you run the risk of data corruption.
More information about the Kernelnewbies
mailing list