develoment workflow: how to avoid duplicate work ?
valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
Tue Jun 5 10:33:21 EDT 2018
On Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:20:16 -0400, Hugo Lefeuvre said:
> Thanks. I think I'll have to read the source code to fully understand
> what happens. Do you know what piece of code handles this reference
> duplication ?
It's not duplication, it's increment/decrement of a counter.
Look for functions with 'get' and 'put' in their names.
> As a conclusion we can assume that ioctl and release never run
> concurrently, and as such the lock introduced in my patch is useless.
Well, they *shouldn't* do so. What the code actually does, however....
> Concerning the TODO at line 876, I think I've misunderstood it. I'll
> think a bit more about it and come back with an updated patch later.
I haven't looked at the code - there's an outside chance that the driver
isn't doing reference counting correctly.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20180605/4e8b27e6/attachment.sig>
More information about the Kernelnewbies
mailing list