Submitting patches to non-staging

[Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar]

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Pratyush Patel <pratyushpatel.1995 at gmail.com
> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl at linux.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Pratyush Patel wrote:
> >
> >> I will be pursuing my undergraduate thesis research in the field of
> >> real-time (operating) systems and as such, I expect to be closely
> >> involved with the timer and interrupt subsystems in Linux (as well as
> >> other areas, but to a lesser degree). I am also hoping to work with
> >> the hrtimer subsystem, and while going through the latest code
> >> (4.5-rc6) of the same, I found a very minor code-level change that
> >> could be incorporated (redundant #ifdef). Would such a change in a
> >> core kernel file be acceptable coming from a beginner? Or should I aim
> >> for the staging drivers first?
> >
> > Dont worry about staging. There is no staing for interrupts and timers.
> Go
> > direct and post to the relevant maintainers and lkml
> >
> >> I very much look forward to contributing my first patch!
> >
> > love to see it.
> >
>
> Here's the archive link:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2165466
>
> Please do let me know in case I did something wrongly.
>
> Awaiting for it to be accepted!
>
> Single line changes like that can be sent to Janitors mailing list.


> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>



-- 
Thank you
Warm Regards
Anuz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20160304/87215efc/attachment.html