[PATCH 2662/2662] Staging: android: Fix 80 character length

[punit vara]

I have created one patch and already submitted. Now I have created
another patch for another directory . What should be the subject of
patch [Patch 2/2] or just [patch ] ???

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:00 PM, punit vara <punitvara at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you sir I will do the same If I would find any patch
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee at gmail.com> wrote:
>> usually i will create the patch with git format-patch -1  to generate the
>> last patch
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM, punit vara <punitvara at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> before changing the file I did git fetch and then git remote update
>>> .At that time all patches came automatically with update .Then I
>>> simply create patch with git format-patch master..my_local_branch
>>> 2662-...
>>>
>>> That is why subject was like [2662/2662] .
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
>>> <sudipm.mukherjee at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I will also do git fetch but numbers will not show. what command you
>>> > gave to
>>> > generate the patch?
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:26 PM, punit vara <punitvara at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Sorry sir about that ..I have done git fetch so another 2661 patches
>>> >> fetched .that's why mistakenly it subject was like that.I again
>>> >> changed patch as you guide and send.Thank you for feedback sir
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
>>> >> <sudipm.mukherjee at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:38:21PM +0530, Punit Vara wrote:
>>> >> >>       This patch is to the Kconfig file which fixes up lines which
>>> >> >>       exceeded the standard  80 character limitation.
>>> >> >>       This file also fixes up 3 warnings regarding paragraph.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Signed-off-by: Punit Vara <punitvara at gmail.com>
>>> >> >> ---
>>> >> > Your subject says 2662/2662. Then where are your 2661 earlier patches
>>> >> > of
>>> >> > the series?
>>> >> > No, that is wrong. The numbers we use when we submit a series of
>>> >> > patches. But for a single patch (1/1) numbers are not required and
>>> >> > 2662
>>> >> > is definitely wrong.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > regards
>>> >> > sudip
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> Punit Vara
>>> >> 9033553488
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Punit Vara
>>> 9033553488
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Punit Vara
> 9033553488



-- 
Regards,
Punit Vara
9033553488