Please do not generate patches purely based on checkpatch.

Yogesh Chaudhari mr.yogesh at gmail.com
Sun Jul 26 16:08:35 EDT 2015


Thanks Valdis. Seems like a d'oh moment now. Never thought of scanning
through the git history for checkpatch . Good tip.

Thanks and regards
Yogesh
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:02 AM <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 13:05:37 +0530, Yogesh Chaudhari said:
>
> > However, is there a place which documents which maintainers(and/or
> > sub-systems) accept checkpatch(or other cleanup related) patches and
> > who will reject them outright? Wouldn't it be good to have this
> > documented, especially given that using the checkpatch is advised in
> > Documentation/SubmitChecklist?
>
> Try something like 'git log drivers/net/wireless/whateverdev' (or
> whatever part of the tree you're looking at, and see if there have been
> previous checkpatch fixes in that part of the tree.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20150726/6df2c72a/attachment.html 


More information about the Kernelnewbies mailing list