ACCESS_ONCE usage inside llist_add_batch function
Cihangir Akturk
cakturk at gmail.com
Sat Feb 28 15:12:23 EST 2015
Reading the lib/llist.c file in the kernel sources, I came across
the llist_add_bach function defined like this;
bool llist_add_batch(struct llist_node *new_first, struct llist_node *new_last,
struct llist_head *head)
{
struct llist_node *first;
do {
new_last->next = first = ACCESS_ONCE(head->first);
} while (cmpxchg(&head->first, first, new_first) != first);
return !first;
}
One thing bugging my mind is the ACCESS_ONCE macro. Is it really
needed here ? I mean I would write this function with ACCES_ONCE
moved outside the loop like as follows;
bool llist_add_batch(struct llist_node *new_first, struct llist_node *new_last,
struct llist_head *head)
{
struct llist_node *first, *old;
old = ACCESS_ONCE(head->first);
for (;;) {
first = old;
new_last->next = old;
old = cmpxchg(&head->first, first, new_first);
if (old == first)
break;
}
return !first;
}
I think that it may be faster to just use the return value of cmpxchg.
But I am not sure about this.
Is my understanding correct ?
More information about the Kernelnewbies
mailing list