Fwd: Eudyptula challenge submissions (patch versus proof)
sanjeevsharmaengg at gmail.com
Tue Feb 3 23:20:54 EST 2015
Please follow some useful information here
IMO,Always summit the patch & proof in single email only but make sure
*Note:Remember to use your ID assigned to you in the Subject: line when
responding to this task, so that Penguin can figure it out to whom this
task assigned in his List.*
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Jerry Snitselaar <dev at snitselaar.org> wrote:
> On 2015-02-02 13:03 MST, Tolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think due to my e-mail below, I was removed from the challenge.
> > Or maybe it was due to the way I submitted the task; separate e-mail
> > for proof and another kernel patch e-mail...
> > I'm not sure if this is due to some script parsing some keywords in
> > kernelnewbies list, but let this be a warning for the rest of you
> > who are taking this challenge...
> > I find this unnecessarily harsh especially when the system
> > takes a very long time to process e-mails and when there's
> > no outlet for process related questions such as mine below.
> > All I wanted to find out was if proof should be in the patch
> > itself or if it's OK to send separate e-mails.
> > It really should be OK to ask for help for harmless submission related
> > questions such as how to use thunderbird or git send-email.
> > Cheers,
> > Tolga
> Did you try emailing little with the process questions? Process
> questions should get answered there as well as questions regarding
> the tasks. It might take some time to get a response, but eventually
> you will.
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Kernelnewbies