Checkpatch Patches

[Sudip Mukherjee]

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 08:44:27AM -0400, nick wrote:
> I am attaching two check patch patches I wrote in the last few days as I am unable to get a reply 
> from the maintainers. Would someone please send them off for me.
> Thanks,
> Nick 

> >From 7bf4229fa2f9c4fcf3243bc738c74bfdc58a6594 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:53:24 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] staging wlan-ng: Add missing a blank line after declarations
> 
> Fixing trivial checkpatch warnings about missing line after
> declarations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail.com>
> ---
> Tested by compilation only.
>  drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h
> index 1f2c78c..20d146b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x.h
> @@ -1376,6 +1376,7 @@ int hfa384x_drvr_setconfig(hfa384x_t *hw, u16 rid, void *buf, u16 len);
>  static inline int hfa384x_drvr_getconfig16(hfa384x_t *hw, u16 rid, void *val)
>  {
>  	int result = 0;
> +
>  	result = hfa384x_drvr_getconfig(hw, rid, val, sizeof(u16));
>  	if (result == 0)
>  		*((u16 *) val) = le16_to_cpu(*((u16 *) val));
> @@ -1385,6 +1386,7 @@ static inline int hfa384x_drvr_getconfig16(hfa384x_t *hw, u16 rid, void *val)
>  static inline int hfa384x_drvr_setconfig16(hfa384x_t *hw, u16 rid, u16 val)
>  {
>  	u16 value = cpu_to_le16(val);
> +
>  	return hfa384x_drvr_setconfig(hw, rid, &value, sizeof(value));
>  }
> @@ -1402,6 +1404,7 @@ static inline int
>  hfa384x_drvr_setconfig16_async(hfa384x_t *hw, u16 rid, u16 val)
>  {
>  	u16 value = cpu_to_le16(val);
> +
>  	return hfa384x_drvr_setconfig_async(hw, rid, &value, sizeof(value),
>  					    NULL, NULL);
>  }
> 1.9.1
> 

> >From 5eb3de22f0760ece1e838d48c8dd9148b4331cdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:07:24 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] staging netlogic: Fix checkpatch errors in xlr_net.c
> 
> This removes the checkpatch errors related to a needed line below
> declaration of a struct and another about a non nessary printk
> message about a NULL allocated skb due to the function returning
> NULL to the caller of the function and the printk no longer being'
> used or needed by any callers.
> 

spelling mistakes  

> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/netlogic/xlr_net.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/netlogic/xlr_net.c b/drivers/staging/netlogic/xlr_net.c
> index 9bf407d..28a42831 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/netlogic/xlr_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/netlogic/xlr_net.c
> @@ -142,10 +142,8 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *xlr_alloc_skb(void)
>  
>  	/* skb->data is cache aligned */
>  	skb = alloc_skb(XLR_RX_BUF_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);
> -	if (!skb) {
> -		pr_err("SKB allocation failed\n");

why the error message was removed ? 
	

> +	if (!skb)
>  		return NULL;
> -	}
>  	mac_put_skb_back_ptr(skb);
>  	return skb;
>  }
> @@ -1104,6 +1102,7 @@ err_gmac:
>  static int xlr_net_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct xlr_net_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
>  	unregister_netdev(priv->ndev);
>  	mdiobus_unregister(priv->mii_bus);
>  	mdiobus_free(priv->mii_bus);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

ohhh .. yeah .. and both the patch failed when i tried to apply them to next-20140916


why are we wasting our time for your patches , which are bound to have some problem ????

thanks
sudip


> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies