Trial Patch

[Hugo Mills]

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:26:32AM -0400, nick wrote:
> On 14-09-10 12:49 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
[snip]
> > Like this one - it's *still* wrong.  Because....
> > 
> > From: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 21:12:56 -0400
> > 
> > You reposted the same broken patch again.
[snip]
> Here is the correct patch.
> Nick 

> >From ad55b627241203a380dd9c708a4feae98446f85f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 21:12:56 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] staging: Fix NULL check for allocating the skb in
>  r8192E_firmware.c
> 
> This patch checks in the loop of the function, fw_download_code if
> a allocated skb is NULL. If the skb is NULL then we first free the
> allocated skbs in the queue of this function with skb_queue_purge
> in order to free the allocated skbs. After the freeing of the queue
> we break out of the do/while of this function as we need to run
> write_nic_byte in order to activate parts of the network card's
> driver. 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c
> index 1a95d1f..a251414 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ static bool fw_download_code(struct net_device *dev, u8 *code_virtual_address,
>  		}
>  
>  		skb  = dev_alloc_skb(frag_length + 4);
> +		if (skb == NULL) {
> +			skb_queue_purge(&priv->rtllib->skb_waitQ[TXCMD_QUEUE]);
> +			break;
> +		}
>  		memcpy((unsigned char *)(skb->cb), &dev, sizeof(dev));
>  		tcb_desc = (struct cb_desc *)(skb->cb + MAX_DEV_ADDR_SIZE);
>  		tcb_desc->queue_index = TXCMD_QUEUE;

   I'll save Valdis the trouble here. This is still wrong. It's
*identical* to the last one you sent. Bit for bit. Again, you've lost
track of even the most fundamental details ("Am I sending the thing I
wanted to?")

   Doing this once or twice, occasionally, is OK. Everyone makes
mistakes every so often. Doing it repeatedly, on a nearly daily basis,
over a period of a couple of months, is simply unacceptable.

   Hugo.

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: hugo at ... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 65E74AC0 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
   --- Our so-called leaders speak/with words they try to jail ya/ ---   
        They subjugate the meek/but it's the rhetoric of failure.        
                                                                         
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20140910/1f99dd13/attachment.bin