[Help] How to Replace File Operations in File System?

[freeman]

2014-02-2017:10, SandeepKsinha :
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:27 PM, freeman <freeman.zhang1992 at gmail.com
> <mailto:freeman.zhang1992 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     2014-02-20 15:31, Rishi Agrawal :
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     I went through your readme. Some questions.
>>
>>     1. How are you encrypting the files? Is it done by the encryptfs
>>     or you are doing it in your module.
>>
>>     2. How can the user selectively encrypt the files in the system.
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Regards,
>>     Rishi Agrawal
>     Hi Rishi,
>
>     Sorry about the fuzziness.
>
>     #1 I plan to do the encryption in my module, but encrypting
>     functions aren't added to it yet. As I mentioned in readme,
>     module now just simply pass-through operations to the original
>     file system.
>
>     #2 It seems that the user cannot select specific file to encrypt
>     inside one directory :-( . However he may specify a directory
>     then we can encrypt all the file inside it. Namely, the granularity
>     is directory, not file. Besides, subdirectory is not supported at
>     present.
>
>
> Why does it even matter - inode vs directory? Is it because you store
> the encryption metadata in the dirent and not the inode?
>  
>
>
>     Regards
>     Freeman
>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Sandeep.
>
> "To learn is to change. Education is a process that changes the learner."
Hi Sandeep,

Actually I haven't got that far...
However as I planed it, I don't want involve the user too much-
just to keep simple. I plan to build a safe box, and people throw
personal things into it. That's all.
I want to use it with Android devices. Will complex implementation
build barrier for ebedded system?
Any suggestions?

Regards
Freeman Zhang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20140220/988b0ea9/attachment.html