Kernelnewbies Digest, Vol 49, Issue 30
Sudip Mukherjee
sudipm.mukherjee at gmail.com
Wed Dec 17 00:15:44 EST 2014
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Jonathan Jin <jjin082693 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:44:08PM -0700, Dean Michael Ancajas wrote:
>> Well said. I think people in general should also pay it forward. Could
>> be a good idea for volunteers to help check others' answers. For
>> instance, people who have passed task 05 should be allowed to check
>> task 1,2,3 etc.. from others' submissions so on and so forth.
>
> Agreed. I think it'd be possible to at the very least crowdsource the
> earlier tasks. For instance, task 1 is basically trivial to check for
> correctness.
>
Sorry, but I don't agree. My opinion : you can review others code only
after you have a good number of patch submission in lkml , and your
submitted patches have been reviewed by others, and ultimately some or
all of them accepted in the linux kernel.
when I started, it took me 3 - 4 attempts to just send the result ,
and then again 2 attempts to clear that task 1.
thanks
sudip
> --
> Jonathan Jin
> jjin.me
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
More information about the Kernelnewbies
mailing list